Hipointtalk.net
http://hipointtalk.net/

Beretta 92 fs
http://hipointtalk.net/viewtopic.php?f=31&t=18996
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Ex_ISP [ Fri Apr 28, 2017 12:35 am ]
Post subject:  Beretta 92 fs

Anyone else have one of these? I find it to have excessively thick grips.
What's ya'lls opinion?

Author:  jasonsch [ Fri Apr 28, 2017 6:49 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Beretta 92 fs

As close as I can get is this:

Image

I sold a new SS Taurus 92 pistol - which I think is a copy of the Beretta - A month or two ago.
And it was pretty thick - But I'm not sure if it was just the grips or if it was the gun too.

Fairly unusual gun too!! The "slide" is really something!!

Author:  Cornhusker [ Fri Apr 28, 2017 6:51 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Beretta 92 fs

I've handled the Beretta and have the Taurus 92, and honestly, I like the Taurus better based on nothing more than the location of the safety.
I really dislike slide mounted safeties.
Aside from that, the Beretta is a great gun although it's not really a CCW.

Author:  srtolly [ Fri Apr 28, 2017 8:23 am ]
Post subject: 

I have the Taurus PT 99, pretty much the same as the Beretta, I could list the difference but where's the fun in that?

The grip is pretty thick for my short fingers but still very controllable, most double stack guns are. Guess that's why I like my Sigma.

Sent from my XT1565 using Tapatalk

Author:  Cornhusker [ Fri Apr 28, 2017 8:31 am ]
Post subject:  Re:

srtolly wrote:
I have the Taurus PT 99, pretty much the same as the Beretta, I could list the difference but where's the fun in that?

The grip is pretty thick for my short fingers but still very controllable, most double stack guns are. Guess that's why I like my Sigma.

Sent from my XT1565 using Tapatalk

My Sigma fits me pretty good too.
Thinking about putting in an Apex kit to get rid of the hinge, but I don't know if it's needed

Author:  waltham41 [ Fri Apr 28, 2017 9:43 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Beretta 92 fs

They do have rather thick grips, but fit my hands well. Its a good think they make lots of different guns in lots of different shapes and sizes.

Author:  Ex_ISP [ Fri Apr 28, 2017 4:59 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Beretta 92 fs

While I have one, and have always felt it to be extremely reliable, I just can't get used to the fatness. WAY fatter then either of my double stack glocks (G22 and G29)

Author:  Cornhusker [ Fri Apr 28, 2017 7:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Beretta 92 fs

They do make some thinner grips.
I had some Pachy's on mine and it was much thinner than the OEM grips I replaced it with.

Author:  srtolly [ Sat Apr 29, 2017 10:23 am ]
Post subject: 

Husker, do the Apex kit. I did have to switch back to the original firing pin spring cuz the one in the kit wouldn't hit hard primers with enough force.

Sent from my XT1565 using Tapatalk

Author:  Cornhusker [ Sat Apr 29, 2017 1:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Beretta 92 fs

Should I get the spring kit too and just not use the FP spring?

Author:  srtolly [ Sat Apr 29, 2017 6:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Beretta 92 fs

Cornhusker wrote:
Should I get the spring kit too and just not use the FP spring?

That's what I did, along with the diy stuff ya can find in the interwebs.

Sent from my XT1565 using Tapatalk

Author:  Ex_ISP [ Sat Apr 29, 2017 7:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Beretta 92 fs

Cornhusker wrote:
They do make some thinner grips.
I had some Pachy's on mine and it was much thinner than the OEM grips I replaced it with.


I'll look into that. Thanks Husk!

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 5 hours
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/